|
|
|
Happenings
Page 2
Typically, a happening is a non-verbal, theatrical production
that abandons the stage-audience structure as well as the usual
narrative line or plot of narrative theatre. The real importance
of happenings, however, lies not in its definition but rather
how it overtly went against the conventions of the time.
Indeed, no theatre conventions were sacred for happenings. The
convention of time was questioned, as happenings held no concern
for the concept of linear time; the convention of place was questioned,
as happenings were often held in obscure places such as lofts,
abandoned factories, or parks; the convention of the audience
was questioned, as many events were often shaped by the actions
of the audience; and the convention of the performer was questioned,
as the characters were often treated as objects and used in a
more allegorical function. Every main component of "theatre"
as we know it was challenged by happenings.
The direct rejection of convention gave happenings a very spontaneous
feel. Yet despite the apparent spontaneity of a happening, the
events were often meticulously scripted and choreographed. For
example, Kaprow described his work 18 Happenings as, "something
spontaneous, something that just happens to happen", though
the entire piece was rehearsed daily for two week prior to its
opening (128).
Back to Page 1 of Happenings
Continue to Page
3 of Happenings, 4
|