Schiller, Hume, and Aesthetic Semblance

Written by Michael Black

Over the course of time, aesthetic semblance has become a key part of aesthetic philosophy. Like many topics in philosophy, the concept of aesthetic semblance is hard to rigidly define because of its intangible nature; however, Friedrich Schiller, in On the Aesthetics of Man, creates a comprehensive explanation of this semblance while trying to establish his philosophy. Schiller's notion of aesthetic semblance set precedent for aspiring philosophers to come and one of these philosophers was G.W.F. Hegel. While Hegel does indeed have his own notion of aesthetic semblance, it is clear that Schiller's philosophy made way for Hegel's explanation. While both philosophers acknowledge aesthetic semblance, their views on its importance differ. The different perceptions about semblance lead Schiller to claim semblance is a key component to appreciation and the truth whereas Hegel stresses appearance, more so than semblance, is needed for the truth.

We must start by acknowledging first the accepted definition of aesthetic semblance used by Schiller and Hegel. Essentially, Schiller and Hegel view semblance as a symbolic function of art that can point to further meaning. Both are able to agree on its existence and meaning, but their arguments differ in its application.

Page 1 of Schiller, Hume, and Aesthetic Semblance
Page 2 of Schiller, Hume, and Aesthetic Semblance
Page 3 of Schiller, Hume, and Aesthetic Semblance
Page 4 of Schiller, Hume, and Aesthetic Semblance