|
|
|
The
Double Helix Page 2
Written
by Michael Black
By showing his more personal side and not focusing on scientific
jargon, Watson allows the reader to view him as more of a detective
collecting clues rather than a scientist collecting data. "I
went ahead spending most evenings at the films, vaguely dreaming
that any moment the answer would suddenly hit me," Watson
said, as if research played no part in the discovery (114). In
fact, Watson rarely speaks of breakthrough research that he is
doing, rather talking about other people's research and how he
interprets it. It seems that Watson would have to make more profound
advancements in order to be a key figure in such a major finding
as the double helix. On the other hand, this likely gives us insight
to how many other scientific processes occur; science is a slow
process that involves many people and deals with small advancements
towards a larger goal. It is almost as if Watson is strategically
realigning already existing pieces to a puzzle, but like many
science processes it was not a straightforward path. Watson and
Crick often had to scrap solid material because of false presumptions,
as Watson accounts, "My scheme was torn to shreds by the
following noon" (120). It was a process of building, tearing
down, and building again.
While
their achievements are undoubtedly profound, clearly Watson and
Crick could not have accomplished the model of the double helix
on their own. "The Double Helix" was "a matter
of five" (at the least) rather than just two (14). Throughout
the story, Watson directly and indirectly comments on the importance
of teamwork
and lack there of. Watson was continually gathering
information from other researchers. Seeing Maurice Wilkins' DNA
X-ray research was instrumental, lectures and meetings with other
researchers were common place, and of course the main partnership
between Watson and Crick was of supreme importance. One of the
most important passages on relations with other researchers comes
near the end of the story once Watson and Crick have completed
their final model. Wilson figured that Wilkins would be bitter
at their success when he came to look at their model, "But
there was no trace of resentment on his face, and in his subdued
way he was thoroughly excited that the structure would prove of
great benefit to biology" (134). This shows that although
competition was fierce, many scientists are in it for reasons
other than personal gratification and share a common goal. Of
course there was plenty of questionable ethics stirring as well.
While scientists are usually open to sharing information in pursuit
of a common goal, Watson says that, "The point had been reached
where Rosy would not even tell Maurice her latest results"
(43). In fact, even Watson admits to questionable play, stating,
"Rosy, of course, did not directly give us her data. For
the matter, no one at King's realized they were in our hands"
(114). In "The Double Helix" it is easy to see how the
relationship between researchers is a key part of the scientific
process and how bad relationships can have a negative effect upon,
and even jeopardize an experiment.
Page
1 of The Double Helix
Page
2 of The Double Helix
Page
3 of The Double Helix
|